Gary Schwarz, Queen Mary University of London, firstname.lastname@example.org
Tom Christensen, University of Oslo, email@example.com
Xufeng Zhu, Tsinghua University, firstname.lastname@example.org
In honor of the upcoming 75th anniversary of the publication of Herbert Simon's seminal book "Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations," first published in 1947, Public Administration Review (PAR) will hold a Symposium titled "Decision-Making in Public Organizations: The Continued Relevance of "Administrative Behavior."
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, which awarded Herbert Simon the Nobel Prize in economics in 1978, considered Administrative Behavior as "epoch-making." Administrative Behavior has a special relationship to PAR, as two of its chapters appeared in PAR prior to the publication of the book (Simon 1944; 1946). The recent resurgence in interest in the behavioral sciences in public administration has reintroduced the book to a new audience (Battaglio and Hall 2019).
One of the reasons why Administrative Behavior has influenced several generations of scholars and practitioners, is that it challenged the prevailing "principles" of administration that were considered to lead to administrative efficiency (Rainey 2001). Pointing out contradictions and incompatibilities between these principles that had been largely ignored, Simon put decision-making at the center of analysis and examined how individuals make decisions within certain organizational frames or contexts. Whereas standard economic theory assumed that individuals are perfectly rational decision-makers, Simon emphasized the limits to rationality that real-life administrators face with regard to memory, attention, or capacity (March and Olsen 1976). He developed a theory of bounded rationality, suggesting that individuals "satisfice" rather than maximize because they cannot evaluate all potential alternatives due to their limited cognitive and information processing abilities and incomplete knowledge. Administrative Behavior was also one of the first books to acknowledge the importance of loyalty and organizational identification for administrative efficiency (Miao et al. 2019), as they align the decisions that individuals make with organizational objectives.
Simon called for empirical research and experimentation into the concepts he developed in Administrative Behavior and this symposium aims to encourage such activity and take stock of the concepts' continued relevance. We are interested in manuscripts from diverse disciplinary perspectives that contribute to a deeper understanding of decision-making in public organizations. We welcome submissions on theory development and empirical studies based on large-scale surveys, experiments, case studies, and other methodologies. We are particularly interested in research that develops the following topics and questions:
Review Process and Timeline
Apr 15, 2020 – Paper proposal (maximum 1,000 words) should be submitted via e-mail, copying in each of the symposium co-editors.
Apr 30, 2020 – Decision on paper proposal communicated to authors.
Aug 24/25, 2020 – Symposium conference at Queen Mary University of London. Authors of accepted proposals are strongly encouraged to participate.
Oct 31, 2020 – Complete manuscripts to be submitted via e-mail, copying in each of the symposium co-editors, for screening and feedback.
Dec 15, 2020 – Manuscripts to be submitted to PAR's online editorial system. Manuscripts undergo PAR's normal peer review process overseen by PAR Co-Editors-in-Chief, Paul Battaglio and Jeremy Hall.
Early 2022 – Planned publication date in PAR.
For more information and references, please see the full call for papers: