View Thread

CfP IRSPM 2015: Rethinking the relationship b/w citizens and public services

  • 1.  CfP IRSPM 2015: Rethinking the relationship b/w citizens and public services

    Posted 09-15-2014 09:21

    Sorry for cross-posting

    +++++++++++++++

    Dear colleague,

     

    We like to draw your attention to a track on the relationship between citizens and public services, that we are organizing at IRSPM 2015.

     

    Kind regards,

     

    Oliver James,

    Sebastian Jilke &

    Gregg Van Ryzin

     

    ---

     

    Call-for-Papers

    IRSPM 2015

    Panel D103 – Rethinking the relationship between citizens and public services

    Closing date for paper proposals is 15 October 2014

    To submit paper proposals go to www.IRSPM2015.com

     

    Panel Chairs

    Oliver James (University of Exeter, UK)

    Sebastian Jilke (Erasmus University Rotterdam, NL)

    Gregg Van Ryzin (Rutgers University, US)

     

     

    Citizens' relationship to public services is being rethought by the academic community and policymakers, reflecting both changes in the modes of service delivery as well as advances in our understanding of the psychology and behaviour of citizens. Public services increasingly rely on choice and market-based 'exit' methods alongside political participation and voice methods, including complaint, lobbying and voting. Moreover, public services are delivered increasingly by non-state actors, markets, choice, and various forms of coproduction, rather than directly by government. Citizens' interaction with services, in turn, has been shown to depend on expectations, perceptions of both performance and process, and broader attitudes and affects toward the public sector, as well as information available from published performance measures and media reports. The relevant outcomes can include satisfaction, trust, cooperation, voice (complaining), switching between providers, and exit to alternative providers, including the private and non-profit sectors. Moreover, responses to public services can affect support for politicians and public institutions, including states, especially given negativity bias in response to performance. Blame shifting and avoidance can be used by politicians and service providers seeking to avoid criticism.

     

    With these issues in mind, we invite theory-based, empirical papers that use experiments and/or analysis of datasets from non-experimental sources on a range of topics that include (but are not limited to):

    • Trust of government, including its antecedents and consequences;
    • Satisfaction;
    • Citizens knowledge and interpretation of performance measures and reports;
    • Cognitive and affective biases in how citizens perceive and evaluate government services;
    • Expectations and their role in satisfaction and other evaluative judgments;
    • Complaining and other voice behaviours, including voting;
    • Choice and exit behaviours with respect to public services;
    • Citizens participation in and co-production of public services.

     

     

    Access the CfP here: bit.ly/1uzXqjH

     

     

     

     

    --

    Sebastian JILKE

    Research associate & PhD cand

    Department of Public Administration

    Erasmus University Rotterdam

    PO Box 1738, room M7-14

    3000 DR Rotterdam, the Netherlands

    F: +31 (0)10 408 2539

    M: +49 (0)176 7601 6371

    www.sebastianjilke.net

     

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    NEW ARTICLE:  Jilke, Sebastian (forthcoming). "Choice and Equality: Are Vulnerable Citizens Worse-off After Liberalization Reforms?" Public Administration, In press.  http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2398902