View Thread

Mon 11:30 session on Trump: A Dialogue on How a Trump Presidency May Affect Equality, Diversity And Inclusion

  • 1.  Mon 11:30 session on Trump: A Dialogue on How a Trump Presidency May Affect Equality, Diversity And Inclusion

    Posted 08-07-2017 09:25
    Dear AOM colleagues:

    Come on out to hear a panel of distinguished diversity scholars share their thoughts on how a Trump Presidency is affecting equality and diversity.

    Aug  7 2017 from 11:30AM to 1:00PM at Hilton Atlanta in the Galleria 1 room

    We hope you can join us!

    Warmly,
    Ed Ng

    -- 
    Eddy Ng, PhD
    Professor and F.C. Manning Chair in Economics and Business
    Dalhousie University

    From: Gender & Diversity in Organizations Division Listserv <GDO-L@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG> on behalf of Donna Blancero <DBLANCERO@bentley.edu>
    Reply-To: Donna Blancero <DBLANCERO@bentley.edu>
    Date: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 12:21
    To: "GDO-L@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG" <GDO-L@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>
    Subject: Mon 11:30 session on Trump: A Dialogue on How a Trump Presidency May Affect Equality, Diversity And Inclusion

    Moderator: Eddy S. Ng, Dalhousie U.
    Panelist: Bernardo M. Ferdman, Alliant International U.
    Panelist: Michelle Hebl, Rice U.
    Panelist: Alison M. Konrad, Western U.
    Panelist: dt ogilvie, Rochester Institute of Technology
    Panelist: Doug Hensler, -
    Panelist: Charles Gossett, California State U. Sacramento

    The election of Donald Trump as President of the U.S. has divided the nation and sent shockwaves around the world. As a community of scholars, we are particularly concerned for underrepresented and marginalized groups such as women, immigrants, racial and religious minorities, and LGBTs. Given the relative importance of the topic to management, organizations, employers, workers, and society at large, the purpose of this panel symposium is to engage a group of diversity panelists in a formal, moderated, interactive discussion of (1) the effect of a Trump Presidency on equality and diversity; (2) the panelists' interpretation of them; (3) coming to terms with the election outcome and coping with backlash; (4) the possibility of locating a common ground between progressives and conservatives; and (5) how it affects our work as a community of scholars.